The impact of the expansion of economic and trade relations between China and Europe on EU-US relations
Subject Areas : Politics
Kamran
Rabani sadr
1
Hakem
ghasemi
2
(Associate Professor, Department of Futures Studies, Faculty of Social Sciences, Imam Khomeini International University, Qazvin, Iran)
Majid
Bozorgmehri
3
Keywords: China economyUStradeEUneoliberalinstitutionalism,
Abstract :
Although the People's Republic of China and the European Union have deep differences on issues such as the position of the state in the Chinese economy and human rights, it must be acknowledged that in recent years the two sides have enjoyed the most dynamic and complementary economies. They have engaged in global integration, bringing to the fore significant strategic cooperation. It is worth noting that the cooperation between FEMA, which has been more than any other factor in trade and direct economic investment, in turn has led to a large impact on the type of US-EU relations between Beijing and the EU. The question posed by the author of the leading research with a descriptive-analytical approach and based on the theoretical assumptions of liberal institutionalism seeks to answer why it is arranged in such a way that the visible and hidden effects of expanding economic and trade relations between China and the EU on How is the relationship between the United States and the European Union assessed? The hypothesis raised by the above question suggests that, on the one hand, the emphasis on a multilateral system based on international law has led to a common commitment between Chinese and European officials, and that, on the other hand, President Trump has chosen a strategy. Protectionism and withdrawal from trade agreements have emphasized that Europe's relations with Washington have largely cooled. The result of the transformation that has taken place is that the strengthening of Sino-EU relations has weakened EU-US relations.
پوراحمدی، حسین و عباسی خوشکار، امیر (1392). خاورمیانه و ایران در سپهر مقایسه کارکرد چندجانبه‌گرایی ناتو و پیمان شانگهای. فصلنامه رهیافت‌های سیاسی و بین‌المللی، 5(36)، 9-46.
جعفری، علی‌اکبر و پیرمحمدی، سعید (1394). سیاست منع اشاعه در کابینه‌های بعد از جنگ سرد آمریکا (کلینتون، بوش و اوباما)، مجلۀ سیاست دفاعی، 23(90)، 175-206.
جمشیدی، محمد و خاتمی، حسام (1399). نقش ابتکار «یک کمربند - یک راه» در نظم نوین اقتصادی چین. فصلنامه سیاست، مجلۀ دانشکده حقوق و علوم سیاسی، 50(1)، 1-20.
خالوزاده، سعید (1389). روابط چین و اتحادیه اروپایی. فصلنامه سیاست خارجی، 24(2)، 481-514.
خضری، رؤیا (1397). روابط اتحادیه اروپا با چین در دوران ترامپ. فصلنامه سیاست خارجی، 32(2)، 131-152.
دانش‌نیا، فرهاد (1391). کاربرد نظریۀ بازی‌ها و نهادگرایی نولیبرال در تحلیل رفتار بازیگران اصلی اوپک گازی. پژوهشنامه علوم سیاسی، 8(1)، 143-172.
شریعتینیا، محسن (1384). روابط اتحادیه اروپا و چین، بازی برد - برد. مرکز تحقیقات استراتژیک مجمع تشخیص مصلحت نظام، معاونت پژوهش‌های سیاست خارجی، گروه مطالعات استراتژیک.
شیخی مفرد، محمدرضا و چیت‌سازان، محمدرضا (1390). جایگاه چین در سیاست خارجی اتحادیه اروپا پس از جنگ سرد. فصلنامه سیاست خارجی، 25(2)، 399-420.
عسگرخانی، ابومحمد (1388). رژیم‌های بین‌المللی. تهران: انتشارات ابرار معاصر.
قهرمان پور، رحمان (1388). رویکرد قدرت‌های بزرگ به موضوع هسته‌ای ایران. تهران: معاونت پژوهشی دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی.
لیتل، ریچارد (1388). رژیم‌های بین‌المللی (ابوالقاسم راه چمنی، ترجمه). تهران: مؤسسه ابرار معاصر.
نظری، ابوذر، احدی، پرویز و یوسفی جویباری، محمد (1399). آینده‌پژوهی روابط همگرایانه یا واگرایانه ایالات‌متحده آمریکا و اتحادیه اروپا تا سال 2030 در مسائل مهم بین‌الملل. فصلنامه راهبرد سیاسی، 4(13)، 185-205.
وکیلی، بهنام، قربانی شیخ‌نشین، ارسلان و میرترابی، سید سعید (1398). ابتکار یک کمربند یک‌راه، نهادگرایی و دیپلماسی انرژی چین. فصلنامه تحقیقات سیاسی بین‌المللی دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد شهرضا، 11(41)، 70-89.
Action plan on the Belt and Road Initiative”, The State’s Council, the People’s Republic of China. March 30 2015, In:
EU – China Economic Relations to 2025: Building a Common Future. 13 September 2017. in: https://www.chathamhouse.org/publication/eu-china-economic-relations-2025-building-common-future.
Armstrong, D.; Farrell, T. & Lambert, H. (2007). International law and international Relations, (2nd edition), Cambridge University Press.
Azizi, H. (2014). China's Soft Power in the Central Asian Region: Approaches, Tools and Goals. Central and Caucasian Journal, 88, pp. 87- 112.
Burley, A. (1993). International Law and International Relations Theory: A China – EU International Trade in Goods Statistics. March 2018, in: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php/China-EU.
Christopher, M. Dent. (2005). Chinas Economic Relationship with the European Union. Department of East Asian Studies, University of Leeds: UK. ( July 2005), p.27.
Commission of the European Communities (1995). a long-Term Policy for China-Europe Relations, Brussels.
Congressional Research Service, CRS Report for Congress. September 22. Dual Agenda. American Journal of International Law, 87(2), 205-239. ed. Boston: Scott Foresman.
Ekman, A.; Nicolas, F.; Semam, J.; Desamaud, G.; Kastouevajean; Serif O. B. & Clelie N. (2017). Three Years of China's New Silk Roads. Institute Francis Relations Internationals (IFRI).
Erdal, A. (2018). China’s Policies in Eastern Europe: the 16+1 Initiative. April 18, in: https://www.europeangeneration.eu/single-post/ 2018/04/18/ China’s-Policies-in-Eastern-Europe-the-161-Initiative.
EU - China Relations (2018), in: https://eeas.europa.eu/sites/eeas/files/ factsheet_ eu-china.pdf.
EU-China 2020 Strategic Agenda for Cooperation, 2018, in: https://eeas. europa. eu/ sites/eeas/files/20131123.pdf
“Fence-Sitters” in the Post-Cold War Era, IGCC. Policy Paper. 8 October. Squassoni, Sharon (2006), Disarming Libya: Weapons of Mass Destruction. In: http:// web. uvic. ca/ europe/ ipsa- rc3/ rwong.pdf. International relations, Cambridge University Press.
Kaczmarski, M. (2016). Silk Globalization, China Vision of International Order. Center for Eastern Studies, Point of View, No. 60.
Keohane, R. & Joseph N. (1989), Power and Interdependence revisited, 2nd, International Organization, Vol. 41, No. 4
Keohane, R. O. (1993). After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the world Political Economy, Princeton University Press Princeston, New Jersey.
Miller, T. (2017). China's Asian Dream: Empire Building along the New Silk Road. Zed Books Ltd: London.
Milner, H. V. & Andrew M. (2009). Power, Interdependence, and Nonstate Actors in World Politics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Nye, J. (1988). Neorealism & Neoliberalism. World Politics, 1(2).
Reed, J. (2018). Here's the only way Trump can win the two-front trade war with China and the EU. 24 May 2018. in: https://www.cnbc.com/ 2018/05/24/ trump-trade-wars-with-china-and-eu-pose-growing-global-dangers.html
Saarela, A. (2018). A New Era in EU-China Relations: more Wideranging Strategic Cooperation?. In: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/ etudes/STUD/2018/570493/EXPO_STU(2018)570493_EN.pdf
Solingen, E. (1994). The Domestic Sources of Nuclear Postures Influencing.
Wong, R. (2005). Toward a Common European Policy on China? Economic, diplomatic and Human Rights Trends. World Political Economy. Princeton: Princeton University Press. www.fpc.state.gov/documents/ organization/78338.pdf.
Uri Dadush, Marta and Dominguez, Jimenez and Tianlang Gao (2019). the State of China European Union Economic Relations, Working Paper, Issue 09, 20 November 2019.
http://english.gov.cn/archive/publications/2015/03/30/content_281475080249035.htm
Mayer, M. (2018). Beyond Stereotypes, 31.07.2018, in: https://www.ips-journal.eu/regions/global/article/show/beyond-stereotypes-2882/?utm_source=taboola&utm_medium=referra