Assessment of satisfaction and environmental quality assessment of residential buildings (case study: institutional hospitals in Isfahan)
Subject Areas :masoud taghvaei 1 , Atiyeh Aliakbari 2
1 -
2 -
Keywords: Housing Organizational Housing Residential Satisfaction Teachers', College and KooyeBahar in Isfahan,
Abstract :
Improving the quality of life and satisfaction of citizens from their residential environment is an important goal of urban management. One of the housing policies in Iran is institutional housing, institutional housing has been created at the national level on state owned land. After years of its implementation, it is necessary to examine the results of this experience in terms of the degree of success and satisfaction in creating quality of life. The purpose of this paper is to evaluate the satisfaction of organizational accommodation and the quality of their residential environment in Isfahan city according to the effective indicators of sustainable housing (environmental, accessibility, physical infrastructure, cultural, social and economic). While satisfaction has a multi-dimensional concept and is shaped by various indicators. This research is applied in a descriptive-analytical and survey nature. In collecting data and information, documentary and field methods and questionnaire tools have been used. The statistical population is the inhabitants of the Kay-Bahar organizational housing estates and the Isfahan professors' community. The sample size was determined by Cochran method, 384 people and 35 experts and 35 managers. In this study, SPSS software and chi-square test, factor analysis and SWOT technique were used. Based on the Chi 2 test, the sig value in the physical dimension is less than 0.05, which indicates the significance of the hypothesis, that is, they are satisfied in three questionnaires of the physical section in all fields. According to the factor analysis, the status of the six indicators is satisfactory for residents of institutional houses. The findings from the SWOT model showed that the review strategies with a total of 6.77 as the first priority and an aggressive strategy with a total coefficients of 6.49 in the second priority of the satisfaction of the housing.